Recently, I noticed that popular job site Indeed has a real issue with centring certain elements of its website. Two major ones it’s homepage appear strangely regardless of which size of device you’re using to view it.
In this example, the Indeed logo is slightly higher than the search field and the ‘Find Jobs’ button is slightly lower than the search field. What you end up with is a really strange, super-long staircase that descends from left to right.
In this second example, the ‘Upload Your Resume’ button is slightly left-of-centre and not aligned with the call-to-action above. (Let’s not forget the fact that it should really be spelt as ‘résumé’, although perhaps I’m becoming too much of a pedant here.)
Why do I consider this worth writing about? So much of modern life is experienced through devices like smartphones, tablets and laptop computers. Whether it’s applying for a job, completing a tax return, editing family photos or composing a major film score.
The world is a beautiful place and if we are to spend so much of our time staring at displays instead, the interfaces with which we interact should be beautiful and thoughtful too. I’m just one guy online and I’m sure that there are numerous things on my site that aren’t perfect—a company as successful as Indeed can afford to spend the time and resources making its site look and perform as it should.
the long-held belief amongst many, that the Republic of Sydney is, in fact, the worst city in Australia, with only one of its suburbs making it into the Top 100 Most Liveable Suburbs in the country.
If you’re unfamiliar with The Betoota Advocate, it’s a satirical news website that focuses on Australian culture and politics. Furthermore, if you’re unfamiliar with my home town of Wollongong, it is in fact its own regional city, being the third-largest city in the state of New South Wales, behind Sydney and Newcastle. Some even joke that the the initialism ‘NSW’ stands for ‘Newcastle, Sydney and Wollongong’ rather than ‘New South Wales’.
Later in the article, a most amusing reason was given for why this key finding was uncovered by the supposed survey:
When asked why they didn’t categorise Wollongong as it’s [sic] own stand-alone city, the researcher explained that they just needed to find something positive to say about Sydney.
I’ve long enjoyed The Betoota Advocate but the two excerpts above stand out to me as some of its best work. When I first found the article online and saw its headline, I naturally assumed that Wollongong was the butt of the joke. When you read it, the author, Hussey, spares no time in mocking the ‘suburb’ of Wollongong and its unfortunate cultural institutions: the North Gong Hotel and Chicko’s, a chicken shop that is labelled an ‘affront to modern health’.
The real butt of the joke here is Sydney, which has been deemed so unlikeable and large that it has become its own republic.
I once worked in Sydney but now that I work in its ‘most liveable suburb’, I only ever visit on occasional weekends for shows, special occasions or planned day-trips. What I have noticed over time is Sydney’s transformation into a bloated mini-country all of its own. Sure, it’s great to visit Circular Quay, Darling Harbour and the newer Barangaroo development, but if you venture much further beyond the CBD, you realise just how far the place sprawls, with a somewhat confusing web of infrastructure and public transport.
Sydney has become so large that I imagine that it is difficult for some Sydneysiders to even imagine other cities beyond their home. As a resident of Wollongong, which is only an 80-minute drive away from Sydney CBD, I have met Sydney people who have said that they’ve never once visited Wollongong. Not visiting regularly is understandable for practical reasons, as Sydney hosts the majority of the job market and those who live there are unlikely to commute out of the city (as residents of Newcastle and Wollongong must often do)… but never? That’s surprising.
Socioculturally and politically, I find this all to be a little concerning. With the long-established view that policy and news-reporting favour the east coast of Australia, what happens to the fabric of our society and the existing divide between city and country, when some Sydneysiders can barely be bothered to regard or visit major regional centres beyond their own urban bubble?
This year is a major anniversary for the beloved iBook, which was first announced and released in 1999. 20 years! Along with iMac, which celebrated its 20th anniversary in 2018, iBook helped to reinvigorate Apple’s product line with a cool, new take on the clamshell design that has come to define laptops, along with a focus on wireless computing and bold colours.
The website apple-history.com does a great job of summing up the role that this device played at the time:
Announced in July 1999 at Macworld New York, the iBook was perhaps the most anxiously awaited Apple computer ever. Aimed at the same consumer market as it’s [sic] big brother, the iMac, the iBook filled the 2×2 consumer/ pro/desktop/portable matrix that Steve Jobs had first detailed more than a year earlier. Its specs closely resembled that of the iMac, with the same ba- sic i/o options, and the same “closed system” concept. In order to bring the price down as far as possible, the design team removed the PC slots, IR, video-out and audio-in ports. The iBook also lacked a high-speed data-port, such as SCSI or firewire.
Mac user Linus Edwards also wrote a retrospective piece in 2013, which was featured on 512 Pixels by Stephen Hackett. I particularly enjoyed this excerpt, which describes why the device was so distinctive:
I remember bringing the iBook home and it looked like a miniature UFO had landed on our dining room table. It was so much smaller than any com- puter I ever had, and it seemed very futuristic. I remember opening and closing its lid, in wonder of the fact it had no latch, and also that when you closed it, it would automatically go to sleep and a tiny light on the outside case would dim in and out, as if it were breathing.
Whilst I was too young in 1999 to own or afford my own computer, I remember seeing them advertised and appearing in public when I was a kid. Being a child of the late Classic Mac era, watching Apple’s transition from a world of beige to a new age of colourful, translucent hardware and its Aqua-themed Mac OS X was very striking. My wife, Natasha, was kind enough to find an iBook for me online a few years ago. Fortunately, she picked the best colour: tangerine. (Fun fact: Jony Ive kicked off his design career with a firm by the name of Tangerine.) You can get a closer look at the device in the photos at the bottom of this article.
Approaching design as a broad concept, the following quote by Steve Jobs has been featured countless times on Apple blogs:
Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works.
Although iBook’s success was very much tied to the way that it worked, such as its emphasis on wireless Internet, it is perhaps more often remembered by users for how it looked. Like it or not, Apple has come to be known as a company that is known for how its products look more often than how they work and the new technologies that they help to popularise.
I love the aluminium-unibody design that has come to define modern Apple, however I would welcome the return of more colour to the company’s design lan- guage. Products such as the iPhone XR and bands for Apple Watch, with their range of bright colours, are a sign of hope in this space. It may be a stretch to hope that Apple would do the same for its laptops and other more traditional computers again, although I believe that enough time has passed since the original iBook to do it again—not with plastic, necessarily, but in a way that will help to keep Apple’s product lines fresh and innovative as we exit the Jony Ive era.